Full Council
Dan Gwalter
WES-POL-0005
1.0
- 1. Purpose
- 2. Scope
- 3. Definitions
- 4. Policy Statement
- 5. Roles and Responsibilities
- 6. Policy Detail and Procedures
- 6.1 Submitting a Complaint
- 6.2 Informal Resolution
- 6.3 Formal Complaint Review
- 6.4 Right to Respond
- 6.5 Record-Keeping
- 7. Related Policies and References
- 8. Compliance and Breach Handling
- 9. Review and Version Control
- 10. Approval Record
1. Purpose
This policy outlines how complaints made to the Western Equestrian Society (WES) will be received, assessed, and managed. It ensures that members, volunteers, WES Professionals, and governance role-holders can raise concerns safely and that all parties are treated fairly.
Complaints are a natural part of a functioning organisation. This procedure exists to support transparency, impartiality, and resolution - not to assign blame. It also protects individuals against unfair treatment, malicious complaints, or unclear processes.
The WES Constitution makes clear that Membership is a privilege not a right. Membership or applications may be terminated or rejected by Council for reasons that Council may feel are detrimental to the interests, policies, programmes, objects or harmonious relationships of the Society and its members.
2. Scope
This procedure applies to complaints involving:
- WES Council members
- Extended Council (e.g. Officers, Area Reps, Show Co-ordinator, Youth Officer, Education Officer)
- WES Professionals (approved instructors)
- WES members acting in an official Society capacity (e.g. clinic organisers, show volunteers)
It does not cover safeguarding concerns (which must be referred to the Youth Officer or designated safeguarding lead) or general feedback and service dissatisfaction (best raised informally or via the Secretary).
3. Definitions
- Complaint: An expression of concern about the behaviour, decision, or conduct of a person acting in an official capacity within WES
- Complainant: The person making the complaint
- Subject: The person who is the focus of the complaint
- Disciplinary Threshold: The point at which a complaint may trigger the formal Disciplinary Procedure
- Panel: A group appointed by the Chair to review and decide on a formal complaint
4. Policy Statement
WES is committed to resolving complaints in a fair, respectful, and proportionate manner. Every complaint will be taken seriously, responded to promptly, and handled with care. Those who raise genuine concerns in good faith will be supported.
However, the Society will also protect its volunteers and Officers from malicious, repetitive, or bad-faith complaints. Anyone raising or responding to a complaint must treat the process confidentially and respectfully at all times.
5. Roles and Responsibilities
Role | Responsibility |
Chairperson | Lead oversight of complaints process; appoint panels where needed; act as escalation point for complaints involving the Secretary |
Secretary | Log all complaints; assess informally; prepare materials for panels; record outcomes |
Panel (if convened) | Review the complaint, consider evidence, and make a recommendation or decision |
Complainant | Submit complaints with sufficient clarity and relevance; participate in good faith |
Subject of Complaint | Respond to any request for information and follow the process outlined |
6. Policy Detail and Procedures
6.1 Submitting a Complaint
- Complaints must be submitted in writing to the Secretary (or to the Chair if the complaint involves the Secretary)
- Anonymous complaints will not normally be accepted unless safeguarding or legal risk is involved
- Complaints should include: the name of the person being complained about; a description of the behaviour or issue; any relevant context, dates, or evidence; and the desired resolution if applicable
6.2 Informal Resolution
- Where possible, complaints will first be assessed informally by the Secretary and/or Chair to determine if the issue can be resolved through explanation, apology, or informal mediation, or whether it needs to be escalated for formal review
6.3 Formal Complaint Review
- If informal resolution is not possible or appropriate, a formal process is triggered
- The Chair will appoint a panel of 2-3 impartial individuals (e.g. Officers not involved in the issue)
- The panel will review the written complaint and may request further evidence or a written response from the subject
- Outcomes may include: no further action; informal advice or expectations set; referral to the Disciplinary Procedure; temporary suspension from a WES role; or recommendation for removal from post
6.4 Right to Respond
- The subject of the complaint will be informed in writing and given a fair opportunity to respond before a decision is made
- Complaints will not be discussed publicly or shared outside those directly involved
6.5 Record-Keeping
- All complaints and outcomes will be logged by the Secretary
- Records will be retained in the Confidential Records Drive and are not disclosed outside of those with a governance need to know
7. Related Policies and References
- Disciplinary Procedure
- Code of Conduct
- Safeguarding Policy
8. Compliance and Breach Handling
Failure to engage with a complaint process - including refusal to provide information, attempts to influence others, or breach of confidentiality - may itself result in disciplinary action. Council members who receive complaints directly are expected to refer them promptly to the Secretary or Chair and must not attempt to handle them informally on their own.
9. Review and Version Control
Version | Date | Author | Changes Made |
0.1 | 18/07/2025 | DG | Initial policy draft |
0.5 | 08/10/2025 | DG | Changes following Chairman's review |
1.0 | 04/11/2025 | DG | Published |
10. Approval Record
Approved By | Date | Notes |
Full Council | 04/11/2025 | Approved for immediate use |